The medically-qualified practitioner who carries out a post–mortem examination.The medically-qualified practitioner who carries out a post–mortem examination.The place where a body is taken after its removal from the place of death.The place where a body is taken after its removal from the place of death.(also post-mortem(also postmortem) A medical examination to determine the cause of death, also called an autopsy.) A medical examination to determine the cause of death, also called an autopsy.(also post-mortem(also postmortem) A medical examination to determine the cause of death, also called an autopsy.) A medical examination to determine the cause of death, also called an autopsy.Young Offender Institution - prison for people aged 21 and underYoung Offender Institution - prison for people aged 21 and underA legal term (Latin for "under judgment") which means that a case is currently at trial or being considered by a judge or court, and so cannot be discussed in public.A legal term (Latin for "under judgment") which means that a case is currently at trial or being considered by a judge or court, and so cannot be discussed in public.Secure Training CentreSecure Training CentreA prosecution for a crime which arises for example from the circumstances of a death.A prosecution for a crime which arises for example from the circumstances of a death.The person who works for the coronerThe legal official who orders a post-mortem and who is in charge of the inquest procedure. and is responsible for making arrangements for the inquest.The person who works for the coronerThe legal official who orders a post-mortem and who is in charge of the inquest procedure. and is responsible for making arrangements for the inquest.The chief legal officer of the United Kingdom. It is a government cabinet position.The chief legal officer of the United Kingdom. It is a government cabinet position.Legal cases which are not criminal trials, sometimes involving a claim for damagesA payment of money in recognition of certain kinds of suffering or injury, also called damages./compensationA payment of money in recognition of certain kinds of suffering or injury, also called damages..Legal cases which are not criminal trials, sometimes involving a claim for damagesA payment of money in recognition of certain kinds of suffering or injury, also called damages./compensationA payment of money in recognition of certain kinds of suffering or injury, also called damages..Legal cases which are not criminal trials, sometimes involving a claim for damages/compensation.Legal cases which are not criminal trials, sometimes involving a claim for damages/compensation.A term used to describe proceedings in the High Court (such as a judicial review) when they are heard by two or more judges.A term used to describe proceedings in the High Court (such as a judicial review) when they are heard by two or more judges.Usually called clinical negligenceClinical negligence is a legal term for a medical accident where a patient has not received care to a proper standard, and that substandard care has also caused the patient a physical injury. Sometimes also called medical negligence., a legal term for a medical accident where a patient has not received care to a proper standard, and that substandard care has also caused the patient a physical injury.Usually called clinical negligenceClinical negligence is a legal term for a medical accident where a patient has not received care to a proper standard, and that substandard care has also caused the patient a physical injury. Sometimes also called medical negligence., a legal term for a medical accident where a patient has not received care to a proper standard, and that substandard care has also caused the patient a physical injury.The part of the Public Funding scheme that allows a solicitor to give advice for the preparation of an inquest for no cost if the client is on income support.The part of the Public Funding scheme that allows a solicitor to give advice for the preparation of an inquest for no cost if the client is on income support.A form of verdict letting a jury give a longer explanation of what they think are the main or important issues.A form of verdict letting a jury give a longer explanation of what they think are the main or important issues.Since 1 October 2009 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has taken over the judicial functions of the House of Lords. It is the court of last resort and highest court of appeal in the United Kingdom.Since 1 October 2009 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has taken over the judicial functions of the House of Lords. It is the court of last resort and highest court of appeal in the United Kingdom.The government's in-house lawyers, who will act for the Prison Service in instructing barristers at inquests.The government's in-house lawyers, who will act for the Prison Service in instructing barristers at inquests.The highest civil court where cases may be heard for the first time. It also hears appeals and conducts judicial reviewA type of court proceeding in which a High Court judge or judges reviews the lawfulness of the way a decision was made or and action was taken by a public body or official such as a coroner.s, and supervises magistrates and crown courts.The highest civil court where cases may be heard for the first time. It also hears appeals and conducts judicial reviewA type of court proceeding in which a High Court judge or judges reviews the lawfulness of the way a decision was made or and action was taken by a public body or official such as a coroner.s, and supervises magistrates and crown courts.Public means-tested financial assistance for representation during legal proceedings. It is not available for representation at most inquests. The Lord ChancellorThe cabinet minister in the government responsible for the effective running of the legal system in England and Wales. can grant it in exceptional cases.Public means-tested financial assistance for representation during legal proceedings. It is not available for representation at most inquests. The Lord ChancellorThe cabinet minister in the government responsible for the effective running of the legal system in England and Wales. can grant it in exceptional cases.The standard of proof in a civil court cases and for inquest verdicts other than unlawful killing or suicide. In these cases, one outcome need only be more probable than all the others.The standard of proof in a civil court cases and for inquest verdicts other than unlawful killing or suicide. In these cases, one outcome need only be more probable than all the others.The standard of proof in a civil court cases and for inquest verdicts other than unlawful killing or suicide. In these cases, one outcome need only be more probable than all the others.The standard of proof in a civil court cases and for inquest verdicts other than unlawful killing or suicide. In these cases, one outcome need only be more probable than all the others.The standard of proof in a civil court cases and for inquest verdicts other than unlawful killing or suicide. In these cases, one outcome need only be more probable than all the others.The standard of proof in a civil court cases and for inquest verdicts other than unlawful killing or suicide. In these cases, one outcome need only be more probable than all the others.An inquest into a death involving the state or state agents is required to be, in many ways, more thorough and wide ranging than inquests that do not engage the duties required by article 2Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights says that the state must not take someone’s life, except in very limited circumstances. The effect of article 2 is that the state has a duty to protect life and to carry out an effective investigation into a death involving the state or state agents. An inquest is normally the way which this is carried outArticle 2Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights says that the state must not take someone’s life, except in very limited circumstances. The effect of article 2 is that the state has a duty to protect life and to carry out an effective investigation into a death involving the state or state agents. An inquest is normally the way which this is carried out of the European Convention on Human Rights says that the state must not take someone’s life, except in very limited circumstances. The effect of article 2 is that the state has a duty to protect life and to carry out an effective investigation into a death involving the state or state agents. An inquest is normally the way which this is carried out of the ECHRThe European Convention on Human Rights is an international treaty to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe, incorporated into UK law as the Human Rights Act 1998. All Council of Europe member states including the UK have signed the Convention..An inquest into a death involving the state or state agents is required to be, in many ways, more thorough and wide ranging than inquests that do not engage the duties required by article 2Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights says that the state must not take someone’s life, except in very limited circumstances. The effect of article 2 is that the state has a duty to protect life and to carry out an effective investigation into a death involving the state or state agents. An inquest is normally the way which this is carried out of the ECHRThe European Convention on Human Rights is an international treaty to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe, incorporated into UK law as the Human Rights Act 1998. All Council of Europe member states including the UK have signed the Convention..An inquest into a death involving the state or state agents is required to be, in many ways, more thorough and wide ranging than inquests that do not engage the duties required by article 2 of the ECHR.An inquest into a death involving the state or state agents is required to be, in many ways, more thorough and wide ranging than inquests that do not engage the duties required by article 2 of the ECHR.The standard of
proof in a civil court cases and for inquest
verdicts other than unlawful killing or
suicide. In these cases, one outcome need
only be more probable than all the others.The standard of
proof in a civil court cases and for inquest
verdicts other than unlawful killing or
suicide. In these cases, one outcome need
only be more probable than all the others.Those people defined in the Coroners Act 1988 as having a right to ask questions at the inquest. Family members such as parents, children, spouses, civil partners or partners of the person who has died automatically come within the definition and can ask questions at the inquest. Other relatives and those with close relationships may also be regarded as Properly Interested Persons.Those people defined in the Coroners Act 1988 as having a right to ask questions at the inquest. Family members such as parents, children, spouses, civil partners or partners of the person who has died automatically come within the definition and can ask questions at the inquest. Other relatives and those with close relationships may also be regarded as Properly Interested Persons.The organisation responsible for providing
Public Funds for legal work.The organisation responsible for providing
Public Funds for legal work.The highest standard of proof required in legal hearings and needed for returning inquest verdicts of unlawful killing or suicide.The highest standard of proof required in legal hearings and needed for returning inquest verdicts of unlawful killing or suicide.The highest
standard of proof required in legal hearings
and needed for returning inquest verdicts of unlawful killing or suicide.The highest
standard of proof required in legal hearings
and needed for returning inquest verdicts of unlawful killing or suicide.Formerly known as police surgeons, FMEFormerly known as police surgeons, Forensic Medical Examiners or police doctors examine and assess the medical needs of people detained in police custody.s or police doctors examine and assess the medical needs of people detained in police custody.Formerly known as police surgeons, FMEFormerly known as police surgeons, Forensic Medical Examiners or police doctors examine and assess the medical needs of people detained in police custody.s or police doctors examine and assess the medical needs of people detained in police custody.The DPP is a government-appointed legal officer who is the head of, and responsible for, the Crown Prosecution ServiceThe CPS is responsible for deciding whether or not there is enough police evidence to undertake a criminal prosecution for a general criminal offence (e.g. manslaughter) both before and in some cases after the inquest, and whether or not a prosecution is in the public interest..The DPP is a government-appointed legal officer who is the head of, and responsible for, the Crown Prosecution ServiceThe CPS is responsible for deciding whether or not there is enough police evidence to undertake a criminal prosecution for a general criminal offence (e.g. manslaughter) both before and in some cases after the inquest, and whether or not a prosecution is in the public interest..The ECHR is an international treaty to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe, incorporated into UK law as the Human Rights ActThe Human Rights Act 1998 is an Act of Parliament that incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law. 1998. All Council of Europe member states including the UK have signed the Convention.The ECHR is an international treaty to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe, incorporated into UK law as the Human Rights ActThe Human Rights Act 1998 is an Act of Parliament that incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law. 1998. All Council of Europe member states including the UK have signed the Convention.Sometimes people find it helpful to get involved in a campaign about the circumstances of their relative’s death. Some people find it helps them to help others going through the same experience. Others want to campaign for changes to prevent similar deaths happening in the future.
Some of the most powerful voices for change are those of the people most directly affected by a death. It is important that you feel comfortable with whatever you decide to do, and that you don’t feel under pressure to do anything you don’t want to. Not everyone wants to be involved in a campaign or to be in the public eye. It might instead be a comfort to know that INQUEST or other organisations will raise the issues arising out of the death or your experiences of the inquest system more generally on your behalf.
Campaigning can mean meeting your MP and/or local councillor, talking to the media or taking more direct action. INQUEST does not run individual campaigns for families, but can give support and advice to families who do. Casework informs our policy, research and campaigning work and the organisation tries to ensure that the collective experiences of families are central to its work for changes to the inquest and investigation process and for greater state and corporate accountability. INQUEST supports families to present their cases directly to parliamentarians and policy makers.
INQUEST’s website has a page for family campaigns as well as other information about some of the more general campaigns that INQUEST is involved in. You may be able to find information on the website that will help you in what you are doing or link you to these other campaigns.
What should I do if I want to campaign about my relative’s death?
There are many ways to campaign. It is always sensible to talk to your lawyer, particularly if you want to take any action before the inquest. You must be careful not to make allegations about the circumstances of the death or about anyone involved with the death that others involved might disagree with before the inquest. You should be careful about giving out personal information about your relative during a campaign. Any of these things could have a negative effect on what happens at the inquest or in any other legal proceedings.
Some family campaigns have set up their own websites or use other facilities on the internet. You could look at how they have done this and consider setting up your own. It is also a good way of making contact with people who might be willing to support you or who have had similar experiences.
Can I speak to the press before, during or after the inquest?
Yes, but be careful about what you say and when you say it. For many families it can help to speak to the media about the death, but you must be aware that they will not always be sensitive or sympathetic, and they may not understand your concerns or even agree that they are important. Despite all this, speaking to the media can still sometimes be a very important way for families to raise their concerns.
Can my MP help?
Sometimes MPs can be very helpful, and they may help you raise the profile of what has happened in the local press. They can sometimes raise concerns in parliament or with other politicians or ministers and they may be able to help you to meet other people with influence or power. So it can help to contact your MP.
Of course not every MP will be able or willing to help you. If you would like to know more about your MP, it is worth reading about them on www.theyworkforyou.com. This is a website which can help you identify who your MP is, what their interests are, how they vote in parliament and what committees they sit on. If different members of your family live in different constituencies you might want to think about which MP is likely to be more sympathetic to your concerns.
Dealing with the media
When there is a sudden or controversial death there is often media interest of some sort. Their interest will depend on the nature of the death and what else is going on in the news at the time.
In many cases there will be interest from the local press immediately after a death. Local papers will often report a controversial death, such as a death in custody or workplace death, even if it is only a brief paragraph, but there is no guarantee that they will keep reporting on what happens over time. The national media is much less likely to report a sudden death, unless there is something particularly controversial or unusual about what has happened. You should be prepared for the possibility that there may be no interest from the media, even though you may feel it should really be of interest to them.
Sometimes families can feel hounded by journalists and it is a good idea to get advice before speaking to them. If you have a solicitor, or are being supported by INQUEST, they may be able to help protect you from journalists if you do not want to talk to them at certain times.
Because an inquest is a public hearing, it is not possible to prevent journalists from attending and reporting on what happens. This can often be distressing because private details about the person who has died may be revealed during the inquest. Things may be said by witnesses attempting to damage the character of the deceased and these can be reported, even though they may be unfair. This is why it can be a good idea to put out a press release before the inquest. That way you can include details about the deceased which you want the public to know and have more chance of getting journalists to see the things that you know are important. If you think the media might be interested in the inquest, it can also be a good idea to have a prepared statement to read out at the end of an inquest.
INQUEST advises families to say only very general things before the inquest about the circumstances of the death and any concerns or questions you have. You may be convinced that something has happened which later turns out not to be true or you may say things in anger or hurt that you will later regret. Sometimes the media can be very helpful and will investigate and raise concerns about the circumstances of a death. It is often a good thing to work with organisations like INQUEST who have experience of working with a lot of journalists to try to get sympathetic press interest for coverage of the inquest.
A word of caution though: for every family who loses someone in contentious circumstances it is the worst event that has probably ever happened to them, but the media do not view things in the same way. Whilst sometimes they are interested in the death, often they will not cover it unless there is a new problem or a particularly dreadful circumstance. They will also often cover the news of the inquest but not explore in a more considered way the issues that arise. You may meet sympathetic journalists who are genuinely interested but cannot convince their editors to take up the story. There is no guarantee that because a journalist interviews you that their newspaper will print it or the television or radio will broadcast it.
Sometimes a journalist may offer you a fee to run a story about your situation – be very careful and think hard about whether this is a good idea. If you are being offered money, there is a real possibility that the magazine, newspaper, etc, is much more interested in entertaining than in serious reporting and you may feel unhappy with the final version. They may also want you to sign a contract, for example preventing you from talking to other journalists, which may not be a good thing.
Campaigning can be a powerful way to achieve something positive after a sudden death. But you also need to be prepared that it can be time consuming and take over more of your life than you had expected. It is important to think about the impact it will have on you and your family and to feel able to stop when you think you have done as much as you can cope with.