The medically-qualified practitioner who carries out a post–mortem examination.The medically-qualified practitioner who carries out a post–mortem examination.The place where a body is taken after its removal from the place of death.The place where a body is taken after its removal from the place of death.(also post-mortem(also postmortem) A medical examination to determine the cause of death, also called an autopsy.) A medical examination to determine the cause of death, also called an autopsy.(also post-mortem(also postmortem) A medical examination to determine the cause of death, also called an autopsy.) A medical examination to determine the cause of death, also called an autopsy.Young Offender Institution - prison for people aged 21 and underYoung Offender Institution - prison for people aged 21 and underA legal term (Latin for "under judgment") which means that a case is currently at trial or being considered by a judge or court, and so cannot be discussed in public.A legal term (Latin for "under judgment") which means that a case is currently at trial or being considered by a judge or court, and so cannot be discussed in public.Secure Training CentreSecure Training CentreA prosecution for a crime which arises for example from the circumstances of a death.A prosecution for a crime which arises for example from the circumstances of a death.The person who works for the coronerThe legal official who orders a post-mortem and who is in charge of the inquest procedure. and is responsible for making arrangements for the inquest.The person who works for the coronerThe legal official who orders a post-mortem and who is in charge of the inquest procedure. and is responsible for making arrangements for the inquest.The chief legal officer of the United Kingdom. It is a government cabinet position.The chief legal officer of the United Kingdom. It is a government cabinet position.Legal cases which are not criminal trials, sometimes involving a claim for damagesA payment of money in recognition of certain kinds of suffering or injury, also called damages./compensationA payment of money in recognition of certain kinds of suffering or injury, also called damages..Legal cases which are not criminal trials, sometimes involving a claim for damagesA payment of money in recognition of certain kinds of suffering or injury, also called damages./compensationA payment of money in recognition of certain kinds of suffering or injury, also called damages..Legal cases which are not criminal trials, sometimes involving a claim for damages/compensation.Legal cases which are not criminal trials, sometimes involving a claim for damages/compensation.A term used to describe proceedings in the High Court (such as a judicial review) when they are heard by two or more judges.A term used to describe proceedings in the High Court (such as a judicial review) when they are heard by two or more judges.Usually called clinical negligenceClinical negligence is a legal term for a medical accident where a patient has not received care to a proper standard, and that substandard care has also caused the patient a physical injury. Sometimes also called medical negligence., a legal term for a medical accident where a patient has not received care to a proper standard, and that substandard care has also caused the patient a physical injury.Usually called clinical negligenceClinical negligence is a legal term for a medical accident where a patient has not received care to a proper standard, and that substandard care has also caused the patient a physical injury. Sometimes also called medical negligence., a legal term for a medical accident where a patient has not received care to a proper standard, and that substandard care has also caused the patient a physical injury.The part of the Public Funding scheme that allows a solicitor to give advice for the preparation of an inquest for no cost if the client is on income support.The part of the Public Funding scheme that allows a solicitor to give advice for the preparation of an inquest for no cost if the client is on income support.A form of verdict letting a jury give a longer explanation of what they think are the main or important issues.A form of verdict letting a jury give a longer explanation of what they think are the main or important issues.Since 1 October 2009 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has taken over the judicial functions of the House of Lords. It is the court of last resort and highest court of appeal in the United Kingdom.Since 1 October 2009 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has taken over the judicial functions of the House of Lords. It is the court of last resort and highest court of appeal in the United Kingdom.The government's in-house lawyers, who will act for the Prison Service in instructing barristers at inquests.The government's in-house lawyers, who will act for the Prison Service in instructing barristers at inquests.The highest civil court where cases may be heard for the first time. It also hears appeals and conducts judicial reviewA type of court proceeding in which a High Court judge or judges reviews the lawfulness of the way a decision was made or and action was taken by a public body or official such as a coroner.s, and supervises magistrates and crown courts.The highest civil court where cases may be heard for the first time. It also hears appeals and conducts judicial reviewA type of court proceeding in which a High Court judge or judges reviews the lawfulness of the way a decision was made or and action was taken by a public body or official such as a coroner.s, and supervises magistrates and crown courts.Public means-tested financial assistance for representation during legal proceedings. It is not available for representation at most inquests. The Lord ChancellorThe cabinet minister in the government responsible for the effective running of the legal system in England and Wales. can grant it in exceptional cases.Public means-tested financial assistance for representation during legal proceedings. It is not available for representation at most inquests. The Lord ChancellorThe cabinet minister in the government responsible for the effective running of the legal system in England and Wales. can grant it in exceptional cases.The standard of proof in a civil court cases and for inquest verdicts other than unlawful killing or suicide. In these cases, one outcome need only be more probable than all the others.The standard of proof in a civil court cases and for inquest verdicts other than unlawful killing or suicide. In these cases, one outcome need only be more probable than all the others.The standard of proof in a civil court cases and for inquest verdicts other than unlawful killing or suicide. In these cases, one outcome need only be more probable than all the others.The standard of proof in a civil court cases and for inquest verdicts other than unlawful killing or suicide. In these cases, one outcome need only be more probable than all the others.The standard of proof in a civil court cases and for inquest verdicts other than unlawful killing or suicide. In these cases, one outcome need only be more probable than all the others.The standard of proof in a civil court cases and for inquest verdicts other than unlawful killing or suicide. In these cases, one outcome need only be more probable than all the others.An inquest into a death involving the state or state agents is required to be, in many ways, more thorough and wide ranging than inquests that do not engage the duties required by article 2Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights says that the state must not take someone’s life, except in very limited circumstances. The effect of article 2 is that the state has a duty to protect life and to carry out an effective investigation into a death involving the state or state agents. An inquest is normally the way which this is carried outArticle 2Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights says that the state must not take someone’s life, except in very limited circumstances. The effect of article 2 is that the state has a duty to protect life and to carry out an effective investigation into a death involving the state or state agents. An inquest is normally the way which this is carried out of the European Convention on Human Rights says that the state must not take someone’s life, except in very limited circumstances. The effect of article 2 is that the state has a duty to protect life and to carry out an effective investigation into a death involving the state or state agents. An inquest is normally the way which this is carried out of the ECHRThe European Convention on Human Rights is an international treaty to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe, incorporated into UK law as the Human Rights Act 1998. All Council of Europe member states including the UK have signed the Convention..An inquest into a death involving the state or state agents is required to be, in many ways, more thorough and wide ranging than inquests that do not engage the duties required by article 2Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights says that the state must not take someone’s life, except in very limited circumstances. The effect of article 2 is that the state has a duty to protect life and to carry out an effective investigation into a death involving the state or state agents. An inquest is normally the way which this is carried out of the ECHRThe European Convention on Human Rights is an international treaty to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe, incorporated into UK law as the Human Rights Act 1998. All Council of Europe member states including the UK have signed the Convention..An inquest into a death involving the state or state agents is required to be, in many ways, more thorough and wide ranging than inquests that do not engage the duties required by article 2 of the ECHR.An inquest into a death involving the state or state agents is required to be, in many ways, more thorough and wide ranging than inquests that do not engage the duties required by article 2 of the ECHR.The standard of
proof in a civil court cases and for inquest
verdicts other than unlawful killing or
suicide. In these cases, one outcome need
only be more probable than all the others.The standard of
proof in a civil court cases and for inquest
verdicts other than unlawful killing or
suicide. In these cases, one outcome need
only be more probable than all the others.Those people defined in the Coroners Act 1988 as having a right to ask questions at the inquest. Family members such as parents, children, spouses, civil partners or partners of the person who has died automatically come within the definition and can ask questions at the inquest. Other relatives and those with close relationships may also be regarded as Properly Interested Persons.Those people defined in the Coroners Act 1988 as having a right to ask questions at the inquest. Family members such as parents, children, spouses, civil partners or partners of the person who has died automatically come within the definition and can ask questions at the inquest. Other relatives and those with close relationships may also be regarded as Properly Interested Persons.The organisation responsible for providing
Public Funds for legal work.The organisation responsible for providing
Public Funds for legal work.The highest standard of proof required in legal hearings and needed for returning inquest verdicts of unlawful killing or suicide.The highest standard of proof required in legal hearings and needed for returning inquest verdicts of unlawful killing or suicide.The highest
standard of proof required in legal hearings
and needed for returning inquest verdicts of unlawful killing or suicide.The highest
standard of proof required in legal hearings
and needed for returning inquest verdicts of unlawful killing or suicide.Formerly known as police surgeons, FMEFormerly known as police surgeons, Forensic Medical Examiners or police doctors examine and assess the medical needs of people detained in police custody.s or police doctors examine and assess the medical needs of people detained in police custody.Formerly known as police surgeons, FMEFormerly known as police surgeons, Forensic Medical Examiners or police doctors examine and assess the medical needs of people detained in police custody.s or police doctors examine and assess the medical needs of people detained in police custody.The DPP is a government-appointed legal officer who is the head of, and responsible for, the Crown Prosecution ServiceThe CPS is responsible for deciding whether or not there is enough police evidence to undertake a criminal prosecution for a general criminal offence (e.g. manslaughter) both before and in some cases after the inquest, and whether or not a prosecution is in the public interest..The DPP is a government-appointed legal officer who is the head of, and responsible for, the Crown Prosecution ServiceThe CPS is responsible for deciding whether or not there is enough police evidence to undertake a criminal prosecution for a general criminal offence (e.g. manslaughter) both before and in some cases after the inquest, and whether or not a prosecution is in the public interest..The ECHR is an international treaty to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe, incorporated into UK law as the Human Rights ActThe Human Rights Act 1998 is an Act of Parliament that incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law. 1998. All Council of Europe member states including the UK have signed the Convention.The ECHR is an international treaty to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe, incorporated into UK law as the Human Rights ActThe Human Rights Act 1998 is an Act of Parliament that incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law. 1998. All Council of Europe member states including the UK have signed the Convention.Dealing with the sudden death of someone close to you as well as an inquest is a particularly difficult experience. Feelings of grief are often made worse by having to deal with the legal issues surrounding the death and the inquest.
The death of someone close affects people at every level: thoughts, feelings, physical health, thoughts and feelings about others and their responses. Grieving is the expression of feelings about the death and loss. Grief is often interrupted by the inquest and held back until it is over; or the inquest itself can cause extra pain and anguish to deal with.
This section of the guide describes what it may feel like after a sudden death, the way the inquest may affect you and how you can get help.
Grieving
How people grieve depends a lot on four things:
1. The sort of person they are.
2. Their relationship with the person who died.
3. The circumstances of the death.
4. The support they receive after the death.
1. The kind of person you are
Bereavement involves all aspects of yourself: your personality, your beliefs, your thoughts and feelings about yourself and others – the sum of your experience of life. Previous experiences of other losses, however big or small, will also affect how you grieve.
2. Your relationship with the person who died
This depends partly on who that person was: maybe your child, friend or partner. For example, you are likely to feel protective towards a son or daughter, even when they have grown up, while you might expect a parent or older friend to be a support to you.
Your feelings will also depend on the kind of relationship you had with the person. It is very common to have mixed feelings about the people you are close to. Relationships change as the years pass by and you go through different experiences, both good and bad. If your relationship was basically loving and secure, you will probably feel that the death is a loss without measure. However, the positive nature of your relationship with the person who has died is likely to be one of the strengths that will help you to keep going. Many people have more complicated relationships with their family members – there may have been unspoken anger or hurt between you, there may be feelings of regret or guilt about the relationship and what you or they could have done – and you are then likely to have very mixed emotions after the death. There may also be different experiences of grief among different family members that can lead to divisions and disputes.
3. The circumstances of the death
For many people reading this guide the circumstances of the death will be one of the most important factors in their grief. It is obvious that you are affected by how, when and where the person died. For example, you are likely to feel very different about an elderly parent dying gently but unexpectedly while dozing in a favourite chair than the way you might feel if they collapsed when out on their own, or were killed by a car when crossing the road. You are also likely to feel very different about the death of an elderly parent than about the death of a son or daughter who you thought would live longer than you. This can be one of the most painful experiences for many of the families we work with.
If the death was as a result of what you believe was carelessness, negligence, violence or an accident caused by themselves or someone else, this will also affect you very strongly. This sort of death also tends to make people question the value of life and the way we think the world ought to be. It will also be very difficult if the person died in custody or in hospital while you thought they were in the care of other people. If someone’s loved one dies in custody they can also feel shame and embarrassment about where they died and overwhelmed if the media say things about the person that are not true or does not present the whole picture of who they were.
Your relative or friend will have been many things in life other than someone who died in prison or in police custody. This can also be true for people whose relative has died in other controversial circumstances and is something that can cause great anxiety and fear before the inquest. At the inquest many things might be said about your family or the person who died which sometimes paint a one-sided picture of who they were and you may feel very upset by this.
4. Support
Everyone needs support after the death of someone close. Support can come from family, friends, religious or community groups and people with experience of bereavement. Some people find it helpful to read books and leaflets on coping with death which may be available from your local
library, health centre or the organisations listed below.
If you experience severe and ongoing symptoms you should go to your GP who may be able to refer you to a counsellor or offer you other help. There are some very helpful websites which give information and support on bereavement including www.healthtalkonline.org
What is grief?
There are some common aspects of grief which people experience, including thoughts and feelings; psychological and physical reactions; and some of the social and practical consequences of dealing with the death of someone close.
There are well known reactions to a death which most people will experience:
• shock
• searching and denial
• sadness and despair
• anger
• guilt
• anxiety, fear and panic attacks
• loss of confidence and feeling powerless
• poor physical health
• loss of hope for the future
• isolation
• depression.
In your grief you may feel some or all of these in this order or in a muddle. You will probably find you go through these feelings and experiences – as well as others which are not described – again and again. You may experience the strongest emotion you have ever known and feel you will never get through it all and think that the pain will never end. You may experience things about yourself and others which you have not experienced before or did not expect.
What usually happens is that as time goes by the feelings are less acutely painful and there will be longer periods during which you can get on with life fairly well – but the experience will always be with you. How long it takes to get on with life depends on who you are and your individual circumstances. If you are at all worried about how you are getting on or are worried about someone else, do talk to one of the people or organisations listed in Section 8 of this guide.
The effect of an inquest
An inquest will be an additional stress for people on top of the loss of someone they love. Waiting for an inquest can put the grieving process on hold and the many official procedures are likely to upset you in many ways creating extra difficulties to cope with. Ensuring that the inquest answers as many of your questions as possible can help in the grieving process. We hope that this guide will give you some information that will help.
Many bereaved people that we have worked with have described feeling some of the following:
• It can be difficult to accept the death if, for example, you do not view the body; if there is a delay before you are told the cause of death because of the length of time it takes to get post-mortem reports and other medical tests completed as well as holding the inquest; if there is a delay in releasing the body for the funeral because of a post-mortem.
• Evidence presented at the inquest or reports in the media (see Section 7) reawaken feelings that you thought you had overcome.
• You feel that everyone else – the coroner, the police, the doctors, the prison officers or anyone else involved in the death – knows more about what happened than you.
• You feel the body has been taken over by the post-mortem process and that you are the last person to be considered in all these official procedures.
• Grieving can be delayed, held up at certain stages or blocked altogether if your emotional energy is focused on someone or something other than your loss. This often happens if you feel upset or angry about some aspect of a post-mortem or inquest. For example, there may be long delays in medical or legal procedures or you are not told about the procedures and what part you can play in them:
– The cause of death given as a result of a post-mortem is not the same as your view of the cause of death.
– The inquest leaves you with more questions than answers about how someone died.
– The inquest does not establish what caused the death.
– The inquest verdict does not reflect what you thought had happened after you had heard all the evidence.
– The inquest is held weeks, months or years after the death.
– The inquest returns a verdict of unlawful killing and yet no one is brought to trial.
– Someone is charged with an offence relating to the death but it is months or even years before they come to trial.
– The person charged is found to be responsible but in your view is given an inadequate sentence.
– The charges are dropped or are lesser than you think they should be.
– You see the person(s) you believe to be responsible at the inquest.
– You are upset by statements made about the person who has died because they do not reflect the true picture of who they were.
– You are distressed by the way the death or inquest is reported in the media.
– You are distressed by the way the media deal with you, your family or your friends.
For some people getting involved in campaigns or trying to stop things like this happening to others can be a help. Other people prefer to keep their grief private. Getting in contact with others who have been through a similar experience can be an immense support and helping others through a similar experience can help you in turn. There may well come a time when you feel that you want to move on with your life.